akpcaptain.blogg.se

Yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii
Yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii







I guess all of them are pretty good once stopped to f/11 but what about f4? Vigneting? Softness? What about the "bookeh" ? So - finaly my questions: - if you would compare these three in the sense of the features that makes the life esay or difficult ( focusing screen, focusing, setting the aperture and shutter speed, changing the film etc) and also in the way the image is rendered. Working lightmeter would be a nice plus but not a necessity 124(G) is supposed the be the cheapest, Rolleicord simply good and Autocord (my preference) hard to find. Indeed the cameras I have mentioned are supposed to be all good although they may not play the same league. So I consider something cheaper, but still capable of good results. So - originally (before the LF) I was lusting after Mamiya 6 (I like ti square!) but found it too expensive (at that point I was not fully aware of the expenses in LF. ) I do not have too much left for this adventure.

yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii

Just a year ago I entered the LF world with 4x5 Tachihara (what a joy!) and now I would like to try out the middle way.Īs most of mine investment still goes into LF (tripod head, lenses, holders.

yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii

In contrast to many other people who are comming the MF from 35mm world I am taking the other way round.









Yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii