data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e61d/8e61d5742833fe32b89ac0bea6c973d35db91be1" alt="Yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii"
I guess all of them are pretty good once stopped to f/11 but what about f4? Vigneting? Softness? What about the "bookeh" ? So - finaly my questions: - if you would compare these three in the sense of the features that makes the life esay or difficult ( focusing screen, focusing, setting the aperture and shutter speed, changing the film etc) and also in the way the image is rendered. Working lightmeter would be a nice plus but not a necessity 124(G) is supposed the be the cheapest, Rolleicord simply good and Autocord (my preference) hard to find. Indeed the cameras I have mentioned are supposed to be all good although they may not play the same league. So I consider something cheaper, but still capable of good results. So - originally (before the LF) I was lusting after Mamiya 6 (I like ti square!) but found it too expensive (at that point I was not fully aware of the expenses in LF. ) I do not have too much left for this adventure.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a049/1a049c8626b05c73de1b398b3efe166515441d66" alt="yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii"
Just a year ago I entered the LF world with 4x5 Tachihara (what a joy!) and now I would like to try out the middle way.Īs most of mine investment still goes into LF (tripod head, lenses, holders.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d95f8/d95f8da42f7da173086a95099cf86526bbf70973" alt="yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii"
In contrast to many other people who are comming the MF from 35mm world I am taking the other way round.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e61d/8e61d5742833fe32b89ac0bea6c973d35db91be1" alt="Yashica mat em vs minolta autocord cds iii"